Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Marek Mahut <mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut <mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-03 06:20:19 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Spec file matches base package name. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - Licenses field in spec matches the content of tarball - License file included in package matches used code (the code is provided under 3 different licenses) - BuildRequires are correct (tests will depend on selenium-server once imported, also see comment #2) - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - Rpmlint is clean. - Builds in mock for rawhide. This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review