[Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597


dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |188268
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-05 08:48 EST -------
I disagree with comment 15. There's plenty of point in having Asterisk even
without Zaptel -- and there's certainly no real need to delay packages on which
it depends, just because we're being slow in getting the Zaptel mess sorted out.

Updated to 0.0.2pre26 and accepted -- package at
http://david.woodhou.se/spandsp.spec
http://david.woodhou.se/spandsp-0.0.2-1.pre26.src.rpm

Go ahead...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]