Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-25 08:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Shouldn't this be swaped? > > > > Current version is 3.0.1-1.1.2, > > if you change something 3.0.1-2.1.2. > > New version upstream 3.0.1-1.1.3 > > The current numbering system is correct, check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages This link to Post-Release_packages applies to 'Non-Numeric Version in Release'. If you don't know the .spec and the upstream version naming, you can't know what is meant by this long version number, if you just see 3.0.1-1.1.2. Usualy the last number is the 'relese bump number'. This destroys anything... -1, for applying Non-Numberic Version guidelines to this Numberic Version... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review