Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-24 12:39:38 EDT --- Does it make sense to package the client without the server? Or is it also on the way? A few other comments: - License is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2 only - Could you explain your strange release number? Currently it's 1.1.2. The first 1 seems to be your 'bump the release' thing, if you change something and the last 1.2 is upstreams' subversion -> 3.0.1-*1.2* Shouldn't this be swaped? Current version is 3.0.1-1.1.2, if you change something 3.0.1-2.1.2. New version upstream 3.0.1-1.1.3 If swaped: Current version is 3.0.1-1.2.1, if you change something 3.0.1-1.2.2. New version upstream 3.0.1-1.3.1 If not swaped, your changed version is later than the new version ( or I didn't understand, what you wanted to do ;) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review