Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #2 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior <henriquecsj@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-22 18:49:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Ugh. "blas.ini" in %{_bindir}?? Yes... it is in the same place that upstream places it (with this strange 644 permission, already fixed). Is it the wrong place? > - You're not owning %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/, add > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > to the main %files. Thank you, I'm doing it right now. > - Are the files in > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help > used by the main program? In that case you don't need to make a separate %doc > package. On the other hand if the files are not used by the program itself, use > %{_docdir} instead of %{_datadir}. You are right, those help files are more like a collection of manuals and it is used by the main software. I'll merge it. > - I think you are missing some buildrequires, since judging from the project > homepage FreeMat links against BLAS. Actually, you should link against ATLAS, > which is faster than reference BLAS & LAPACK. I've just look at an "how to build in Linux file", but with a little lack of details. I'm going to do some more reading about linking it in ATLAS. I'm waiting for some answers from upstream too. Thank you for your help Jussi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review