Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Summary|Review Request: Djblets - A |Review Request: |collection of useful |python-djblets - A |classes and functions for |collection of useful |Django |classes and functions for | |Django Flag|needinfo?(ramez.hanna@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #25 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-21 13:09:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > I've done the initial import into the devel branch. > > I can tag and build 0.5rc1 in all the branches, but I'd rather go ahead with > the update to upstream's latest, 0.5.5. I've tested a mock build; looks good > here. Any thoughts? Sorry for not responding. Looking in the package db, this is indeed in Fedora as "python-djblets" https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-djblets Looks like this review should have been closed out at that point. Renaming this bug to "python-djblets" and closing this review out as "CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE". Re comment #23 and #24, looking at the above link I see that Dan took Stephen's changes and committed them and built them about an hour ago, so we have the latest version of python-djblets built into rawhide (thanks Dan!). I think if there's a call to issue updates for earlier releases, file them as separate bugs to avoid confusing this review further. I've checked and there is a "python-djblets" is a component in bz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review