[Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322


Daniel Elstner <daniel.kitta@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.kitta@xxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #22 from Daniel Elstner <daniel.kitta@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-12-20 05:23:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> * License
>   - As http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ says libstdc++ documents
>     are under GFDL, the license tag should be "GPLv2+ and GFDL".

No, the API reference documentation is released under the same license as the
libstdc++ source code.  It's not made very visible:

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt01ch01s02.html

See the bottom of the page.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]