Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Bug 522207 depends on bug 522272, which changed state. Bug 522272 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright <kwright@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-19 20:23:26 EDT --- * BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is provided because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0" and "Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 versions are needed to distinguish our need for OpenJDK rather than libgcj * "Conflicts: tomcat-native" is required because we truly cannot run when this package is present * Several packages may own the "%{_datadir}/pki/" and the "%{_javadir}/pki/" directories, since there are multiple subdirectories (some owned solely by one package) underneath these common directories -- see "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership"; * Mon Dec 7 2009 Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.3.0-4 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Removed 'postinstall' tasks - Removed 'with exceptions' from License * Tue Nov 24 2009 Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.3.0-3 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Use "_javadir" macro when appropriate * Mon Nov 2 2009 Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Take ownership of directories Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review