Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-18 06:35:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum shared-color-targets-0.0.1.tar.gz* 47d52e4f4c21f88f71cb0332d7b07702c3efbb5fc24afe8b6022000e50db2e49 shared-color-targets-0.0.1.tar.gz 47d52e4f4c21f88f71cb0332d7b07702c3efbb5fc24afe8b6022000e50db2e49 shared-color-targets-0.0.1.tar.gz.1 [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ > > * Relocate docs related to Wolf Faust's work. > > Not done. Programs such as gnome-color-manager are expecting them to be in > /usr/share/share-color-targets/$(VENDOR)/{README|LICENSE} -- this is so the > user can click a link to the target readme or licence in the GUI and it will be > displayed automatically. They shouldn't be listed as doc files as if they are > missing then clients can't display the licence of the targets, which is bad. > > I hope this is okay, as functionality in the GUI client depends on the fact > they are present, and named in this way. > > Richard. > > New spec file: > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets.spec > New SRPM: > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.7.20091218git.fc12.src.rpm Ok, understood. You need to own %{_datadir}/shared-color-targets directory - that's the only issue remaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review