Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-15 18:41:19 EDT --- #001: Why do need BR for the meta package ? #004: The following is not required # poky-depends %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}etch1 #005: %files : directory and file ownership %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} <<< 1 %{_bindir}/poky-* %{_datadir}/%{name} <<< 2 1 >>> directory ownership 2 >>> directory ownership and all the files and folders it contains. When you are using %{_datadir}/%{name} you don't have to use %dir %{_datadir}/%{name #006: the meta package should be a noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review