Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright <kwright@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-15 14:18:14 EDT --- The "pki-native-tools" package does not own "%{_datadir}/pki/" -- however, multiple packages do own various subdirectories under "%{_datadir}/pki/": # rpm -qf /usr/share/pki dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-2.fc11.noarch -- sole-owner of "/usr/share/pki/common-ui/" pki-common-1.3.0-4.fc11.noarch -- sole-owner of "/usr/share/pki/scripts/" dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-2.fc11.noarch -- sole-owner of "/usr/share/pki/ca-ui/" ... Since Dogtag encompasses "six" distinct servers, but does not require all six to be installed, many distinct subdirectories will be owned under the common "/usr/share/pki/" directory, and we therefore follow the rule as described in: "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership"; > 2)why obsoletes and provides included here? > Provides: pki-common-ui = %{version}.%{release} > > Obsoletes: pki-common-ui < %{version}.%{release} > > I can't see package pki-common-ui in fedora. > Dogtag directory server includes a "UI" package called "dogtag-pki-common-ui" whereas Red Hat directory server includes a "UI" package called "redhat-pki-common-ui". By providing "pki-common-ui" from both of these packages, we are able to have the dependent package "pki-common" simply Require "pki-common-ui", and thus can easily change the runtime "UI" components. > 3) why following Requires is needed? > Requires: bash >= 3.0 > Seven of the eight "UI" packages contain a single "Require" statement; we used "Requires: bash" (removed the >= 3.0) so that rpm would not complain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review