Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #10 from Mario Ceresa <mrceresa@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-14 11:26:06 EDT --- Hello Leon, sorry for the delay. I was trying to understand with Peter which is the policy for this type of problems. As far as I understand, if modifications are quite big, I can accept it as-is. On the other hand if modifications are a simple renaming to gXlib and removal of the unused bits, then I'm afraid but you'll have to remove gXlib, patch and require python-xlib before I can approve the submission. I'll try and dwell a bit into the code to understand how deep was xlib modified when copied and renamed, and if I could figure an easy patch to decouple from gXlib. You might want to politely ask the developers how would they proceed should they have to remove the gXlib dependency and rely instead on a system wide package, and post the link to the answer. This might be very helpful! Please be patient :) Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review