[Bug 209025] Review Request: xfce4-dev-tools - Xfce developer tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xfce4-dev-tools - Xfce developer tools


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209025





------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-03 11:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> SHOULD Items:
> 
> OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.

will do.

> However, there might be some more Requires.
> I see it checking for the following at runtime:
> 
> ## Check for a suitable make

added make

> ## Check for autoconf, first trying autoconf-2.59, then autoconf-2.58, then

libtool already requires autoconf >= 2.50 and Core 5 comes with autoconf-2.59

> ## Check for intltoolize

provided by intltool

> ## Check for libtoolize

provided by libtool

> ## Check for glib-gettextize

added glib2-devel

> ## Check for gtkdocize

added gtk-doc

> ## Check for aclocal, first trying aclocal-1.9, then aclocal-1.8, and finally

already provided by automake

> ## Check for autoheader, first trying autoheader-2.59, then autoheader-2.58,

already provided by autoconf

> ## Check for automake, first trying automake-1.9, then automake-1.8, and finally

libtool requires automake >= 1.4, Core 5 comes with 1.9

> 
> 2. Should require the Xfce package that owns datadir/xfce4...
> Should perhaps be xfwm4? (which I need to fix to own that dir).

In this case I agree with Patrice, so I made the new package own
%dir %{_datadir}/xfce4

New Package:
SRPMs at http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/noarch/
SPEC at
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-dev-tools.spec

* Tue Oct 03 2006 Christoph Wickert <fedora christoph-wickert de> - 4.3.99.1-2
- Some more requires: glib2-devel, make and gtk-doc.
- Own %%{_datadir}/xfce4

(In reply to comment #3)
> It seems to me that the m4 macros should also be in 
> /usr/share/aclocal
> such that it is possible to simply use autoreconf and the 
> like.

I think most macros should already be in there now, but when I run xdt-autogen I
still see:

 Please add the files
   codeset.m4 gettext.m4 glibc21.m4 iconv.m4 isc-posix.m4 lcmessage.m4
   progtest.m4
 from the /usr/share/aclocal directory to your autoconf macro directory
 or directly to your aclocal.m4 file.

Any idea where to get the missing files from? glib21.m4 looks like a
version/naming problem to me. The current glib2-devel-2.10.3 on Core 5 only
provides glib-2.0.m4. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]