Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-11 14:34:36 EDT --- Umm.... Again sorry to raise license question, however: This time from mock build (koji scratch build result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870124 ) I tried to check the licenses of rpms listed as BuildRequires and its dependencies, then: ----------------------------------------------------------------- bsf-2.4.0-3.fc12 ASL 1.1 jakarta-oro-2.0.8-6.3.fc12 ASL 1.1 xalan-j2-2.7.0-9.5.fc12 ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and W3C xml-commons-resolver-1.1-4.16.fc12 ASL 1.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Would you explain how these are used? (Especially bsf, jakarta-oro are listed directly as BuildRequires and lib/*.jar contains jars included in these rpms so I guess these 2 rpms are actually used for tvbrowser) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review