Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-11 07:10:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > > > Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in > > > > this particular case? > > It's a pity you didn't answer this - For now I advise reviewers not to approve > > this package. > > > I really have a feeling you are trying to be more of a blocker than a > contributor. Do a reasonable job and I will not complain. - This case however, you went too far - I am expecting you to excuse. Besides this: * Basing works on private forks are a classical way inexperienced programmers outsmart themselves (c.f. "bundled API incompatible libs). * Proposing to include them into Fedora is typical for new-comers, who are not aware about the issues they are causing. * It would not be the first time somebody @RH was pushing a RH fork into Fedora, without coordination with upstream and/or other distros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review