Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-11 02:59:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > This is not a private fork. > Your fork is your private pleasure. > What do you mean? I decided to fork because i want to add features and upstream has no time. > Should it make it into Fedora, it is nothing but a Red Hat/Fedora proprietary > fork, competing with other distros, other forks and the official upstream. > There is no official upstream now, he does not want to maintain, please read what i have said earlier. > > What makes a fork private or public? > Launch an official project, with home-page, mailing list etc. Home page: https://fedorahosted.org/libtar-ng/ mailing list: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/libtar-ng-devel Next time, investigate before you say something! > > > I am ready for other people to contribute to this project too, its just that > > its hosted on fedorahosted which is easier for me then putting it on > > sourceforge. > There is nothing wrong with hosting a project on fedorahosted. > > > > Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in > > > this particular case? > It's a pity you didn't answer this - For now I advise reviewers not to approve > this package. I really have a feeling you are trying to be more of a blocker than a contributor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review