Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537437 Bug 537437 depends on bug 537431, which changed state. Bug 537431 Summary: Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-10 16:50:21 EDT --- There is a possible licensing problem. During mono-bouncycastle review it was discovered that mono-bouncycastle contains ASL 1.1 licensed code, which is incompatible with GPL. itextsharp contains code that is dual licensed under (LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1). The problem is with LGPLv2+, which is not compatible with ASL 1.1. It might be possible that MPLv1.1 is compatible with ASL 1.1, but I couldn't find any references about that. I wrote to bouncycastle csharp crypto mailing list [1] and filed a ticket with their bugtracking system [2], asking if they could relicense the ASL 1.1 code under ASL 2.0. It should certainly be possible to solve this issue, as the ASL 1.1 code in bouncycastle originates from the Apache ANT project, which has been subsequently relicened to ASL 2.0. [1] http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharpdevmailarchive/msg00370.html [2] http://www.bouncycastle.org/jira/browse/BJA-238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review