Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-10 07:50:08 EDT --- Thanks for review... (In reply to comment #3) > [NO] rpmlint is silent > > $rpmlint ./openjade-1.3.2-35.fc13.src.rpm > openjade.src: W: no-url-tag > openjade.src:5: E: prereq-use sgml-common >= 0.5 > openjade.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jade > openjade.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jade > openjade.src:217: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. > > $rpmlint ./openjade-1.3.2-35.fc13.i686.rpm > openjade.i686: W: no-url-tag > openjade.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided openjade-devel > openjade.i686: W: self-obsoletion jade obsoletes jade > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > Prereq is used, but Requires (or BuildRequires?) should be used > "URL: http://openjade.sourceforge.net/"; should be added to the SPEC file. Rpmlint warnings fixed > > [NO] final provides and requires look sane > It should probably not contain both "Provides:jade" and "Obsoletes:jade" Probably could be kept - versioned ... last version is ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.2/en/os/i386/SRPMS/jade-1.2.1-9.src.rpm from Red Hat 6.2 . I see this harmless, I'll comment this and keep it > > The following code is no longer necessary, because .la files are not packaged: > # Fix up libtool libraries > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' | \ > xargs perl -p -i -e "s|-L$RPM_BUILD_DIR[\w/.-]*||g" Dropped... Fixed and built as openjade-1.3.2-36.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review