Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-10 03:26:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Also the lib you are building against is not the same instance as the > one that this is then ran against. Its a private lib in the build. No, I do not build libraries multiple times. E.g. liblcgdm is only built by the lfc SRPM, the other three has the lcgdm-devel as a build dependency. > Lastly on a separate note rather than say > /etc/init.d/lfc-mysql > should/could it be > /etc/init.d/lfc > > and an ghost and alternative to lfc-mysql , -postgres instances. Would > be consistent with the other files managed under alternatives. > Is it possible to make the init.d script db independent and avoid the > situation completely? No, the alternatives in Fedora has a --initscript option for this purpose. These initscripts should however not themselves be handled by alternatives, and must have different names for different altenatives. The alternatives system makes sure that only one of the alternative's initscript is active at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review