Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-03 04:08 EST ------- If we ship OpenPBX in Fedora then I'm sure its developer base will increase. And where they're using code inherited from Asterisk, can't they just port fixes from Asterisk too? But I really would prefer to ship Asterisk itself. The only reason I'm even considering OpenPBX is because of the _technical_ improvements -- mainly eliminating the _requirement_ for zaptel, and shipping app_conference. Let's go ahead with an Asterisk package without zaptel for now, and then work on getting the rest up to scratch. http://david.woodhou.se/asterisk/asterisk.spec http://david.woodhou.se/asterisk/asterisk-1.2.12.1-1.src.rpm Oh, I took spandsp out of that too -- I'll put it back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review