Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #52 from Arun SAG <sagarun@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-09 22:39:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Sorry, we have two patches in the package: > > emacs-goodies-el.texi.patch which ist a small patch. But the only thing what I > can see in the patch is the try to replace the string 'emacs-goodies' whith > 'emacs-goodies-el'. This is not good, because the el subpackage should only > contains the emacs sources of this emacs releated package. this mean, in common > a user will only install the emacs-goodies package and the el subpackage may be > only installed, if the user want to examinate or to modified the emacs sources > of the macros. Hi, it does the reverse of what you have said :-) . It replaces 'emacs-goodies-el' string with 'emacs-goodies' > emacs-goodies-el_31.2-1.diff which has a size of approximately 477 Kilobytes > and lok like the way how applications are pached in Debina. I can't believe, > that this patch conatins only Fedora specific modifications. So please talk to > the upstream maintainer how this patch may integrated in the main source tar > ball. It is a upstream provided patch. i got the patch from _debian upstream itself_ http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.2-1.diff.gz ( i will add a comment about it in SPEC file). when applying this patch it gives birth to 48 more patches :-) @PSG could you please integrate those patches inside source tar ball if possible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review