[Bug 208636] Review Request: perl-PPI-Tester - A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-Tester - A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208636





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-03 00:35 EST -------
This fails to build for me.

First the "perl Build.PL" bit hangs; from the looks of an strace it's waiting
for user input.  Prepending "echo|" gets things going:

+ /usr/bin/perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
Warning: prerequisite ExtUtils::AutoInstall 0.49 not found.
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Warning: Guessing NAME [PPI-Tester] from current directory name.
Writing Makefile for PPI-Tester

And then there's no "Build" script to run.  (A Makefile is created instead, for
whatever reason.)  I added BR: perl(ExtUtils::AutoInstall) and the build makes
it to completion.  It took me quite some time to figure that all out, though.

The only rpmlint complaint is over the src.rpm:
   W: perl-PPI-Tester strange-permission PPI-Tester-0.06.tar.gz 0444
which admittedly is a bit weird but isn't a blocker (and won't really matter
once it's in CVS anyway).

Oddly, I could not run this within the mock chroot, because it can't find any
fonts.  I wonder if there's a missing runtime requirement somewhere.  (If so
it's almost certainly not here, but in one of the dependencies.)

The %check tests are successful, but aren't terribly happy:
t/01_compile....Error: Unable to initialize gtk, is DISPLAY set properly?
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Wx.pm line 179.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Wx.pm line 180.
ok

Unfortunately I can't test this because there's no perl(Wx) package for FC5 yet
and because of the above font problem; I'll try to get a rawhide machine going
tomorrow but if I don't have a chance to do so then I'll leave it up to you to
test it.

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   9fcad41d6b2e33cfdf4025eb29644fae  PPI-Tester-0.06.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper (needs perl(ExtUtils::AutoInstall))
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(PPI::Tester) = 0.06
   perl(PPI::Tester::App)
   perl(PPI::Tester::Window)
   perl-PPI-Tester = 0.06-1.fc6
  =
   /usr/bin/perl
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(FindBin)
   perl(PPI::Dumper)
   perl(PPI::Lexer)
   perl(PPI::Tester)
   perl(Wx)
   perl(Wx::Event)
   perl(base)
   perl(constant)
   perl(lib)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=2,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr +  0.05 csys =  0.19 CPU)
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]