Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #10 from Fabien Archambault <marbolangos@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-08 13:16:26 EDT --- Hi, sorry for my slow answer. For the moment I have no other package to submit as I a trying to do the spec for mpqc but I have many errors and I am trying to understand all of them. If you can read French: http://forums.fedora-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=44709 I filled my surname and changed the spec file in order to be in adequation with it. Here are the rpmlint : $ rpmlint packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint packmol-debuginfo-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I upped thos new files to : ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/srpms/packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.src.rpm ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/rpms/x86_64/packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/rpms/x86_64/packmol-debuginfo-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm For the number of characters I have maximum 78 in one line I thought it was ok. I am seeing for an informal review. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review