Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 Summary: Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: richard@xxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-profiles.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-profiles-0.0.1-0.8.20091208git.src.rpm Description: The shared-color-profiles package contains various profiles which are useful for programs that are color management aware. This package only contains the free profiles that can be safely distributed with Fedora. *** BIG FAT LEGAL NOTE *** The SRPM ships with a lot of ICC profiles that we cannot use in Fedora[1] and therefore I'm only installing the profiles found in ArgyllCMS which are in the public domain. Other profiles will be added to the Fedora package in the future only if they are free software, ack'd by redhat-legal. I expect the number of manufacturers to relicence their profiles to CC-BY-ND or CC-BY-SA to be small, but still significant. The configure script defaults to only including the free profiles, not all of them. I guess someone could take the srpm and build it in rpmfusion with --enable-adobe --disable-argyll as shared-color-profiles-bad and it should coinstall nicely. This means that the noarch file is only a few kb in size, but the srpm is massive (13Mb). Worry not. *** BIG FAT LEGAL NOTE *** I want to make shared-color-profiles a hard dep on gnome-color-manager, as the next version will have UI that defaults to either the Adobe compatible gamut or the sRGB compatible gamut. This is required to make the UI feature compatible with what there is in OSX and Windows 7. The fact that the shared-color-profiles size is small also doesn't pose any issues if g-c-m is installed on the LiveCD by default. As an aside, if we ever hear back from the official ICC guys and fedora-legal give us the okay, we can use the official ICC profile, rather than the public domain one. Until then we're shipping the latter as it's 99% the same thing. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-December/msg00009.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review