Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-08 09:29:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) * License > I understand your comments and have implemented them, but have a question > regarding the License portion. This would require changing the LICENSE file in > the original tarball. So, what is the best way to do this: re-packaging 4.21 > (4.21-2) with updated LICENSE information, or waiting for 4.22 and re-posting > it here? Thanks. - Don't change 4.21 tarball itself. As you are the upstream - If you don't want to release 4.22 now, include new license text in the srpm (as SourceX) and keep 4.21 tarball itself as it is. Then replace the license text with the new one at %prep or so. - If you release 4.22, it is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review