[Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761


Michal Nowak <mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak <mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-12-08 04:03:49 EDT ---
Though, shouldn't we generate the C code from Vala, when rebuilding, ourselves? 

Since we don't have Vala-specific policy here, I'd use Fonts Packaging Policy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Building_from_sources
where we sometimes have source files for OTF/TTF font files and we should build
from them.

I am not an expert on Vala but if maintainer is going to fix a bug in Deja Dup,
I guess they fixes it in meta-code (Vala) rather than in code (C) itself.

Just an idea.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]