Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-07 13:18:05 EDT --- Ah, you seems to be the upstream for clamtk, then: First of all, what does "the same terms as Perl itself" (in LICENSE file) exactly mean? - From your spec file, it seems to mean "ASL 2.0" - However http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ shows perl 5 license is under "ASL 2.0 or GPL+" - And $ rpm -qi perl shows on Fedora the license of perl is marked as "(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)". Note that (from clamav.src.rpm) clamav is under GPLv2 (not GPLv2+) and ASL 2.0 is incompatible with GPLv2, so ASL 2.0 (only) is not allowed for clamtk license: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review