Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-02 19:56 EST ------- Looking at the spandsp review bug, it seems I was wrong -- we can put spandsp in. I've also been looking at OpenPBX, which is apparently due for release soon. I'm not particularly impressed by their political reasons for forking Asterisk, but they have a codebase which: - Uses POSIX timers instead of ztdummy - Contains app_conference, again not requiring zaptel - Contains chan_bluetooth I wonder if OpenPBX would be a better choice for packaging in Extras, if Digium refuse to put their kernel modules upstream and refuse to remove the most gratuitous dependencies on them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review