Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-04 16:32:55 EDT --- Licenses match. Some strange variations of .. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. line, which I think other than breaking automated license checkers don;t change the spirit, Source little hard to tell if it matches because its not an official release tarball and the steps to reproduce it are not included (yeah I know that it comes from git.gnome.org), would be nice to have some basic instruction in the spec file. Builds in mock. Installs without fuss. Runs fine as far as I can tell. The purpose of gcm-session is a unclear to me on a cursory glance. $rpmlint gnome-color-manager-2.29.1-0.1.20091204git.fc13.x86_64.rpm gnome-color-manager.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US colour gnome-color-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/gcm-apply.desktop 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Can be ignored, although I think the British spelling is not necessary in a package called gnome-_color_-manager - The GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL bits are redundant since --disable-schemas-install seems to be handled properly - the gtk-update-icon-cache run in %post should probably be moved to %posttrans as per the packaging snippets guidelines - The scrollkeeper bits aren't necessary since it has been obsoleted by rarian. Looks ok. Issues not fatal but would be nice if addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review