Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-04 06:01:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The COPYING file just contain the LGPL2.1 and doesn't say anything about using > a later version of the license. Sometimes you get the license text in the > COPYING file and a note in the README on how to apply the license. IE LGPLv2.1 > only or LGPLv2.1 or any later version at the users choice. Hence my point. COPYING is just the license text and does not distinguish between a particular version of license or "any later versions". The paragraph Simon quoted also does not solve this question, it only says "If the Library specifies a version number ..." So please take a look at the headers, they do specify a version number. All of them read: * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either * version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. So LGPLv2+ is the correct license tag. You should always rely on the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review