[Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840





--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2009-12-03 17:27:44 EDT ---
- You still have the empty Requires: line that has been commented out in the
spec. Please remove it.

- Normally the %build and %install phases are placed consecutively in the spec
file, and the %check phase is somewhere near the end (e.g. before %clean). This
is due to the fact that %check is ran after %install.

- I'm wondering about the arrangement of the files. I don't think udcli should
be in the -devel package. It would make a lot more sense, if udcli was in the
main package. (Or a subpackage named udcli, as called by upstream)
  If the libs are used by other software, too, then one can separate the
library into a subpackage. (-libs or libudis86 as called by upstream)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]