Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #35 from Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@xxxxxxx> 2009-12-03 15:33:19 EDT --- I think I caught everything you pointed out except with the following: 1) I didn't do much about file/dir permissions yet but will. I have questions I'll post in a separate comment. 2) I didn't rename the libdspam to dspam-libs because you can install the library independent of dspam, it can be used in other projects/programs. If someone were to write a plugin for evolution or thunderbird. the dspam package is only necessary for an MTA, whereas the library can be used in all sorts of places. 3) The libdspam-X are required by the library for storage of all the token data it produces. So I'm not sure what to call them other than libdspam-X, I could rename them to dspam-plugin-X or dspam-storage-X but that implies you need the dspam package which you don't. So if you could advise what to do here. %changelog * Sun Nov 29 2009 Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@xxxxxxx> - 3.9.0-0.10.BETA4 - Change dspam init to not be enabled by default - Add EVR dependancy from all sub packages - Removed pkgconfig requirement - package -n dspam-web renamed to package web - Updated perl requires even though dspam-web is not being built currently - Added post/preun requirements to chkconfig and initscripts - Updated defattr lines - use _initrddir instead of _sysconfdir/rc.d/init.d (RHEL compat) - updated source file permissions - get libdspam to own the sql-scripts directory http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.10.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review