Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-02 07:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > This builds in mock; rpmlint complains about the following: > E: libglade-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > I think this is due to /usr/lib64/libgladeConf.sh. A couple of other packages > (libxml2-devel, libxslt-devel) do this. I guess it's some pre-pkgconfig > behavior or something. It's pretty bogus, but I don't think it's a blocker for > a legacy library like this one. OK, left that one. > Additionally, rpmlint on the installed package complains: > > W: libglade undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libglade-gnome.so.0.4.2 > glade_standard_build_children > > plus 17 additional undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. I guess it would be nice > for these to go away, but again, this is a legacy library and these aren't > generally blockers in any case. I believe I've fixed this in -19, along with the /usr/lib64 rpaths on the x86_64 build. Given that you approved the package already, I'll import it and build it. Any new issues you have, I'll fix in cvs. Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade-0.17-19.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review