Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-02 02:57:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > What's the reason for the mesa-libGL-devel requirement in the devel > > sub-package? > It should be > Requires: libGL-devel > because the package doesn't actually depend upon Mesa's libGL-devel, but upon > an arbitrary package which provides "libGL-devel" Requiring libGL-devel versus mesa-libGL-devel is fine by me. But why does libgle-devel explicitly require libGL-devel? gle.h doesn't include any other include files. My gle-devel package required xorg-x11-proto-devel and did not own the /usr/include/GL directory, but I think having libgle-devel own /usr/include/GL is better. But I don't understand the libGL-devel requirement, since libGL-devel isn't required to build against libgle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review