Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #9 from William Witt <william@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-01 00:25:14 EDT --- Went with forgoing the noarch so that I could use %{_libdir}, then using some sed-fu to "patch" the source files based on build arch. I there is a better way of doing this, please let me know. rpmlint: [unamanic@gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/mintmenu-4.9.0-9.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [unamanic@gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mintmenu-4.9.0-9.fc12.x86_64.rpm mintmenu.x86_64: E: no-binary mintmenu.x86_64: W: no-documentation mintmenu.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/bonobo/servers /mintMenu.server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. no-binary: it's pure python, so there won't be one no-documentation: upstream doesn't have any either script-without-shebang: this file is an xml bonobo server file not a script, I'm not sure what rpmlint is expecting here koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839656 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-9.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review