Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #26 from R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-30 10:58:09 EDT --- I see that even though I had disabled the otpd, it was started by a upgrade -- should there be a '[condrestart]' rather than an a formal [stop and start always] here? [herrold@centos-5 otpd]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/otpd-3.2.5-2.x86_64.rpm Password: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:otpd ########################################### [100%] Stopping /usr/sbin/otpd: [FAILED] Starting /usr/sbin/otpd: [ OK ] [herrold@centos-5 otpd]$ An admin might want the man pages or the resynctool, but not the daemon, I think This is sort of discussed with implementations, at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484345 -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review