Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-01 20:42 EST ------- This builds in mock; rpmlint complains about the following: E: libglade-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I think this is due to /usr/lib64/libgladeConf.sh. A couple of other packages (libxml2-devel, libxslt-devel) do this. I guess it's some pre-pkgconfig behavior or something. It's pretty bogus, but I don't think it's a blocker for a legacy library like this one. Additionally, rpmlint on the installed package complains: W: libglade undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libglade-gnome.so.0.4.2 glade_standard_build_children plus 17 additional undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. I guess it would be nice for these to go away, but again, this is a legacy library and these aren't generally blockers in any case. Full review forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review