Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #24 from R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-30 09:48:46 EDT --- The question was asked about how to unpack a SRPM made by a later RPM version -- the '--nomd5' sub option solved that, by omitting the checksum test. I see no problems with the packaging at this point. As I am not eligible to 'sign off' on a packaging, I will ask a friend to do the formal review. Was it possible to get the 'resynctool' added here, or in a side packaging? -- Russ herrold [herrold@centos-5 ~]$ cd build [herrold@centos-5 build]$ cd otpd/ [herrold@centos-5 otpd]$ wget http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm --2009-11-30 09:43:59-- http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm Resolving www.gpaterno.com... 78.46.44.108 Connecting to www.gpaterno.com|78.46.44.108|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 1198392 (1.1M) [application/x-rpm] Saving to: `otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm' 100%[======================================>] 1,198,392 280K/s in 5.4s 2009-11-30 09:44:06 (218 KB/s) - `otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm' saved [1198392/1198392] [herrold@centos-5 otpd]$ rpm -Uvh --nomd5 otpd-3.2.4-2.src.rpm 1:otpd ########################################### [100%] [herrold@centos-5 otpd]$ rpmbuild -ba ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/otpd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review