Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx | AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(nobody@fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-28 12:32:26 EDT --- Ok, looking at this srpm, most of the warnings and errors are gone. Good! However: 1. (not blocking) fontlint does not like any of the resulting font files, they all need fixing but I guess it's not worse than before 2. (not blocking) the lucida typewriter files declare broken style naming that really needs fixing or apps won't be happy 3. (not blocking) all the files have almost-complete (but not complete) coverage of one or more unicode blocks (probably reflects unicode changes since they were last updated) 4. (blocking) License: Lucida is probably wrong for the base package, it should be GPLv2 and MIT 5. (not blocking) Requires: fontpackages-filesystem is not needed for the base package 6. (blocking) since the bitmap-fonts package does not exist anymore, it needs to be garbage-collected. Please add an Obsoletes: bitmap-fonts < 0.3-14 to the bitmap-fixed-fonts subpackage (let's not be fancy, it's not worth it) It seems I was a little optimistic before, this package needs some tweaking yet. But it has progressed a lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review