Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-01 09:15 EST ------- Umm.. I must explain why I wonder for xscreensaver-base dependency as xscreensaver maintainer in FE. (In reply to comment #17)) > Because many of the kde screensavers actually use xscreensaver What do you mean by "many of the kde screensavers"? This means that many KDE screensaver "hacks" (not "daemon") uses xscreensaver "daemon" (i.e. /usr/bin/xscreensaver) ? (In reply to comment #18) > But do all the xscreensaver-based screensavers actually *work*? > I'd venture possibly not, because %configure checks for the hacks > location at buildtime, and > in the absense of that, it may just end up guessing. Yes, configure of this package tries to check for the path of xscreensaver hacks, and NO hacks are included in xscreensaver-base. So mockbuild without xscreensaver-base correctly finds correctly all xscreensaver hacks (as all hacks are installed in the two hacks). xscreensaver-base includes only the files related to xscreensaver "daemon". And all the hacks packaged in xscreensaver-{extras,gl-extras} can actually work without xscreensaver-base because all hacks in xscreensaver does NOT use xscreensaver daemon, they are completely stand-alone. This is why xscreensaver-extras, xscreensaver-gl-extras does not require xscreensaver-base (this is very intentional), and gnome-screensaver can use xscreensaver-related hacks without xscreensaver-base. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review