Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-01 02:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > - Is xscreensaver-base really required? > > Yes. %%configure checks for the presence of the xscreensaver bits at buildtime. Actually I tried mockbuild with xscreensaver-base removed from BuildRequires and * mockbuild suceeded without any failure * the results of "rpm -qlp" and "rpm -ql --requires" make no difference It seems that configure checks where xscreensaver hacks are installed and does not check if xscreensaver daemon is installed. I still wonder why this package requires xscreensaver-base (for Requires:). KDE uses its own screensaver daemon, doesn't it? Does this package require xscreensaver daemon or xscreensaver configuration program? > > W: kdeartwork-extras macro-in-%changelog _libdir > > W: kdeartwork-extras macro-in-%changelog _libexecdir > > Use %% to avoild having macros expanded. > > Oops, will fix that. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review