[Bug 225731] Merge Review: epic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225731





--- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka <jpopelka@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-11-26 04:05:42 EDT ---
formal review of epic-2.10-6.fc12 is here, see the notes below:

YES source files match upstream:
  865424a56eaaf674847d0e48bcdbc2c5  sf-1.35.irc.gz
  8ed73a76ac758f581d764dc60b708e86  sf-bitchx-scheme.irc.gz
  dd75ad70b46b331b008d976880899233  sf-eggsandham-scheme.irc.gz
  3a7151f0b2913964eb5e38b6c1a2697d  sf-light-scheme.irc.gz
  90c9dc5fc9f372843f8a0732fba61eb1  sf-perry-scheme.irc.gz
  92789d75f12882696817865ea072e44a  epic4-2.10.tar.bz2
  b28872ca9234650eda6842ffc3425849  epic4-help-current.tar.bz2
YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
YES dist tag is present.
YES build root is correct.
YES license field matches the actual license.
YES license is open source-compatible.
YES License text included in package.

NO latest version is being packaged.
  epic4-2.10.1.tar.bz2 was released 09/05/2009

YES BuildRequires are proper.
YES compiler flags are appropriate.
YES %clean is present.
YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
YES debuginfo package looks complete.

NO rpmlint is silent.
  >rpmlint epic-2.10-6.fc12.src.rpm epic-2.10-6.fc12.x86_64.rpm
  epic.x86_64: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers
  epic.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/epic/help/8_Scripts/nopaste
  ...
  epic.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/epic/help/8_Scripts/mkpdir
  epic.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/epic/script/epic-crypt-gpg-aa 0644 /bin/bash
  epic.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/epic/script/epic-crypt-gpg
0644 /bin/bash
  epic.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/epic-2.10/COPYRIGHT
  epic.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/epic/help/5_Programming/fec
  epic.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/usr/share/epic/ircII.servers
  epic.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers
  2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 87 errors, 1 warnings.

YES final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
YES owns the directories it creates.
YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
YES no duplicates in %files.

?? file permissions are appropriate.
  See some rpmlint errors. 

YES scriptlets are sane.
YES code, not content.
YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
YES no headers.
YES no pkgconfig files.
YES no libtool .la droppings.
YES not a GUI app.

Please look at the rpmlint errors and either fix them or confirm they are false
positives.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]