Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226206 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka <jpopelka@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-25 12:24:00 EDT --- YES source files match upstream: 8c19ff62ed4f7d64f8e2aa59cb11f364 ntp-4.2.4p7.tar.gz YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. YES License text included in package. YES latest version is being packaged. YES BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. ntp.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary NTP ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntpdate.init 0775 ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntp.dhclient 0775 ntp.src: W: strange-permission ntpd.init 0775 ntp.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch5: ntp-4.2.4-linkfastmath.patch ntp.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary NTP ntp.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ntp/crypto/pw 0600 ntp.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/ntp/crypto 0750 ntp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ntpstats ntp.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpd ntpdate.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ntp/keys 0600 ntpdate.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpdate ntpdate.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntpdate ntp-perl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ntp 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 11 warnings. YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. ?? file permissions are appropriate. see rpmlint errors YES scriptlets must be sane. YES code, not content. YES large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. Please look at the rpmlint errors/warnings and either fix them or confirm they are reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review