Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-25 04:53:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Actually ethos is fine because that's what the upstream name of the project is. ACK. There is no rule to name a lib lib* > The README file states that it uses the LGPLv2.1 license and doesn't state 'or > later versions' hence the reason the + wasn't added. > I believe this is correct. The README file? Please look in the COPYING. This is the file to figure out the correct license. > # Tarfile created using git > # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos > # git archive --format=tar --prefix=%{name}-%{version}/ %{git_version} | bzip2 > > %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > %define git_version 9d3aae9 > %define tarfile %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 This part is okay, but not what she meaned. Josephine, if you create this tarball you get another md5sum. But this is normal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review