Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |steve.traylen@xxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2009-11-23 16:08:00 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825910 yes: rpmlint above. yes: package name. yes: spec file name yes: globus package guidelines. yes: ASL 2.0 in .SPEC yes: ASL 2.0 in reality. yes: GLOBUS_LICENSE file included. yes: english spec. yes: legible spec. yes: source matches upstream. yes: builds (fc13) yes: build requires sane. yes: buils on archs - see koji yes: no locaes. yes: no ldconfig needed. yes: no system libs. yes: not reloc' yes: no duplicates. yes: Package contains all directories it creates or pulls them. yes: everything %defatt yes: cleans everything. yes: macro use good. yes: contains code. yes: java doc in seperate package. yes: %doc not needed runtime. yes: no devel package. yes: no static libs. yes: no pkgconfig files. yes: no devel packages. yes: no .la files. yes: no gui. ?: Owns files from other packages. see below. yes: %install cleans itself. I notice quite a few packages seem to own /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Globus including this one. Steve yes: utf8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review