Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2009-11-23 14:13:03 EDT --- Hi Mary, The review looks good, just change the docs to noarch and I'll approve. Steve http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825761 yes: rpmlint above. yes: package name. yes: spec file name yes: package guidelines. yes: GPLv2+ in .SPEC yes: GPLv2+ in reality. yes: COPYING file included. yes: english spec. yes: legible spec. yes: source matches upstream. $ md5sum jarjar-src-0.9.zip ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jarjar-src-0.9.zip 61825e60d0466e328c7d24a6cef2c643 jarjar-src-0.9.zip 61825e60d0466e328c7d24a6cef2c643 /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jarjar-src-0.9.zip yes: builds (fc13) yes: build requires sane. yes: buils on archs - see koji yes: no locaes. yes: no ldconfig needed. yes: no system libs. yes: not reloc' yes: no duplicates. yes: pulls in jpackage-utils to own directories yes: everything %defatt yes: cleans everything. yes: macro use good. yes: contains code. yes: java doc in seperate package. yes: %doc not needed runtime. yes: no devel package. yes: no static libs. yes: no pkgconfig files. yes: no devel packages. yes: no .la files. yes: no gui. yes: %install cleans itself. yes: utf8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review