[Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652


Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |lkundrak@xxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |lkundrak@xxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>  2009-11-21 18:59:07 EDT ---
* Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines
* SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented
* License tag correct, license packaged as %doc
* RPMLint silent
* Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages
that provide them
* Provides/Require list ok
* Built fine in mock (with dependency repository added)

Objections:

1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]