Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-11-21 13:53:00 EDT --- Good work, Mat. * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * Builds fine in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1821764 * RPMLint happy (a couple of false positives about spelling errors in fc13) * Filelist okay * Provides/Require list ok A few objections: 1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS? There seem to be a source/sdk bundle available at the downloads page: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/downloads/?project=uml2 2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description. It does not always look well in package management front-ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review