Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx, | |mbarnes@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-18 12:53:22 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-gtkhtml-3.28.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 2009-11-18 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint says: mingw32-gtkhtml.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US webbrowser mingw32-gtkhtml.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US webbrowser mingw32-gtkhtml-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgtkhtml-editor.a mingw32-gtkhtml-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.a mingw32-gtkhtml-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gtkhtml-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US mingw mingw32-gtkhtml-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US mingw mingw32-gtkhtml-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. ! I guess rpmlint is right about 'webbrowser', but other errors are harmless and expected for mingw32 packages. ! The matching native package is named 'gtkhtml3', and I think this one should also be named mingw32-gtkhtml3 (with '3'). + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license ! The stated license differs from the native Fedora package (LGPLv2+ and GPLv2) + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. sha1sum: b0abcf98447acf385a108061bb7f80769bc18a0e gtkhtml-3.28.0.tar.bz2 b0abcf98447acf385a108061bb7f80769bc18a0e Download/gtkhtml-3.28.0.tar.bz2 + Package builds in koji + BuildRequires look sane + The spec file handles locales properly + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package contains code or permissible content + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries are in mingw32-gtkhtml-static subpackage + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + Although ReviewGuidlines says that packages should not contain libtool .la files, MinGW guidelines allow them. + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames are valid UTF-8 While you are at it, can you also update the package to match the version of gtkhtml3 in F-12? CC-ing native gtkhtml3 package maintainer in case he has any comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review