Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-18 04:07:13 EDT --- > rhnlib seems to be a special case and you can ignore those warning yes, it is special case > but please remove libselinux-python. I would like, but if I remove it, it is not included. I build test package with that Requirese: removed and got: $ rpm -qpR /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-rhncfg-git-c9cd2e0cf23a7bd6eaed93435c305d7b1c975378/noarch/rhncfg-5.9.13-1.git.c9cd2e0cf23a7bd6eaed93435c305d7b1c975378.noarch.rpm python rhnlib rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 > License should be "GPLv2 and Python" (e.g. compile.py is based on > Python-licensed code) - asked spot about this to be sure Did not know. Done. > PYTHON-LICENSES.txt should be added to %doc Done > This require should be moved up to the main package. Done. > Therefore please remove all provides from > the spec file unless you have a proper explanation for them. Old heritage. I tracked it to year 2003 and could not find reason, why it has been added. Dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review